Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Dean v. EYM PIZZA OF ILLINOIS, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02926
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dean
Defendant:
EYM PIZZA OF ILLINOIS, LLC and Eduardo Diaz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(HC) Diaz v. Thompson et al
as 2:2021cv01755
Petitioner:
Eduardo Diaz
Respondent:
Paul Thompson, Federal Correctional Institution Herlong, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ARGUETA v. KU-WASHINGTON CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO DIAZ ARGUETA, DIAZ ARGUETA MODESTO JOSE, JOSE LISANDRO DIAZ CARRANZA and others
Defendant:
JIM KU, KU-WASHINGTON CORPORATION and KU-WASHINGTON CORPORATION doing business as SICHUAN PAVILION
Eduardo Jacobo-Diaz v. William Barr
as 20-72520
Petitioner:
EDUARDO JACOBO-DIAZ, AKA Eduardo Diaz Jacobo
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
DIAZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv10715
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO DIAZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIAZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67083
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO DIAZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROLLE v. BOROUGH OF CLAYTON et al
as 1:2020cv03384
Defendant:
JAMES D LANGLOIS, EDUARDO DIAZ, BOROUGH OF CLAYTON and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. ROLLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
