Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Corson v. EXP Realty LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
Lisa Corson
Defendant:
EXP Realty LLC and Boomtown ROI, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sellars v. EXP Realty LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04389
Plaintiff:
Antoinette C Sellars
Defendant:
EXP Realty LLC, Summit Funding, Prestige Partners Realty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Woodson v. Ashkenazi et al
as 3:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
James Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Asaf Y. Ashkenazi, Genesis Ma Real Estate, INM Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Usanovic v. EXP Realty LLC
as 2:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
Kelly Usanovic
Defendant:
EXP Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Holton v. EXP Realty, LLC
as 8:2023cv00734
Plaintiff:
David Holton
Defendant:
EXP Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Fabiola Acevedo et al v. eXp World Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Fabiola Acevedo, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant:
eXp World Holdings, Inc., eXp Realty, LLC, Michael L Bjorkman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ra-Amari et al v. RE/MAX, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03171
Plaintiff:
James Ra-Amari, Misty Ra-Amari and Rosemary Afful
Defendant:
RE/MAX, LLC, EXP Realty, LLC, UMRE Investment Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Fulto v. EXP Realty, LLC
as 1:2022cv22042
Plaintiff:
Kelly Fulto
Defendant:
EXP Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Chambers v. EXP Realty, LLC
as 0:2022cv60494
Plaintiff:
Delroy A. Chambers, Jr.
Defendant:
EXP Realty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
