Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Richard Montgomery v. Warden, FCI Fairton
as 5:2021cv00784
Petitioner:
RICHARD MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
REYNALDO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv03192
Plaintiff:
VILLALOBOS REYNALDO
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DOES 1-50, STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. Warden, FCI Fairton
as 1:2020cv00411
Petitioner:
Damon Elliott
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Fairton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SANCHEZ v. WARDEN FCI FAIRTON
as 1:2020cv12041
Petitioner:
EDGAR SANCHEZ
Respondent:
ACTING EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT ROBINSON and WARDEN FCI FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MONTGOMERY v. WARDEN FCI FAIRTON
as 1:2019cv16762
Petitioner:
RICHARD MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CLARK v. WARDEN FCI FAIRTON
as 1:2017cv05791
Petitioner:
KENT CLARK
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAIL v. FCI FAIRTON
as 1:2016cv06991
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LAIL
Defendant:
FCI FAIRTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WADE v. WARDEN FCI FAIRTON et al
as 1:2015cv08925
Petitioner:
HUGH MAURICE ALLEN WADE
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FAIRTON and U.S PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COFIELD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv00558
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, INMATE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION SYSTEM , FPI-INMATE CLAIMS EXAMINERS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
KEENAN K. COFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Benson v. USA, et al
as 14-4801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN BENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE, Chief and Regional Counsel and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
