Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Fidel Martinez-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-72264
Petitioner:
FIDEL MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Martinez
as 3:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Fidel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fidel Martinez-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73778
Petitioner:
FIDEL MARTINEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Fidel Martinez v. Ac And S, Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-81684
Defendant:
Ac And S, Inc
Plaintiff:
Fidel Martinez
Fidel Ruedas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-72349
Petitioner:
FIDEL MARTINEZ RUEDAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Martinez v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00592
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen and Brad Livingston
Plaintiff:
Fidel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia et al v. Goings et al
as 1:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
Alfred Garcia, Cornelius Alix, Anthony J Boyd and others
Defendant:
Reginald Goings, Brian Rodeen and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel Martinez Herrera, et al v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-72996
Petitioner:
MANUEL FIDEL MARTINEZ HERRERA and JUANA FRANCISCA ORTIZ SUAREZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Adame et al v. D.B. Parking Lot and Janitorial Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00346
Plaintiff:
Hugo A Adame, Hugo A Adame, Corneljo Martinez and others
Defendant:
D.B. Parking Lot and Janitorial Maintenance, Inc. and Dorothy L Divito
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
ABLES,ET AL V. A.C.AND S.INC.ET AL
as 2:2007cv66350
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA L. ABLES, JAMES ABLES, LEON ADAMS and others
Petitioner:
EARNEST GREENLEE
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.P. INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
