Cases 11 - 20 of 1,397
Jones v. Johnson County Detention Center, et al
as 24-3173
Defendant:
INMATES IN 7-8, FNU GAINS, (FNU) WISEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
DEDRICK A. JONES
Fleming v. LNU
as 5:2024cv01167
Petitioner:
Rhonda Fleming
Respondent:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Lawton Correctional Rehabilitation Center GEO et al
as 5:2024cv01169
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Lawton Correctional Rehabilitation Center GEO and FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Tevin Jamal Anderson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olguin v. LNU
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Angel Gabriel Olguin
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. TDCJ Corporation et al
as 6:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Kevin Morris, Sr.
Defendant:
Securus Corporation, All Medical Directors, Texas Board of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kingsley v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv03193
Defendant:
United States of America, (fnu) (lnu) and Geo Transport Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kurt Kingsley and Kurt Thomas Kingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cooley v. City of Lawrence, Kansas et al
as 5:2024cv03191
Defendant:
Ashley (lnu), Chris (lnu), Bart Little John and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Cooley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Hatch, et al
as 24-2160
Defendant:
FNU MONTOYA, Unit Manager, DAVID GONZALEZ, Deputy Warden, ALISHA TAFOYA LUCERO, Secretary of Corrections; JOHN DOE, Director of Adult Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WIGGINS
Wiggins v. Hatch, et al
as 24-2159
Defendant:
DAVID GONZALEZ, Deputy Warden, D. JACKSON, Sergeant, FNU MARTIN, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WIGGINS
Lopez Acevedo v. LNU
as 1:2024cv01075
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Cruz Lopez Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
