Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Wallace v. Fardon et al
as 6:2020cv03280
Defendant:
Dr. Tyner, Dr. Sarrazin, Michael D. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone R Wallace
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fry v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 4:2020cv00669
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc, DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Fry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fry v. USA
as 4:2018cv01168
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marshall Fry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hope et al v. Normandy Schools Collaborative
as 4:2018cv00799
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Hope , Benita Mercer , Byron Fry and others
Defendant:
Normandy Schools Collaborative
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02949
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02014
Plaintiff:
Jarmond Johnson , James Abold , Cristhian Alcala and others
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jinright et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01849
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Jinright , Cathleen Acker , Toni Adams and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fry v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv04094
Plaintiff:
Frederick B. Fry
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
White v. United Van Lines, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv01080
Plaintiff:
Glenda F. White
Defendant:
United Van Lines, LLC and Fry Wagner Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fry v. Colvin
as 5:2016cv06094
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Frances Fry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
