Cases 11 - 20 of 792
v. KENDALL et al
as 8:2023cv03187
Defendant:
Hon. FRANK KENDALL, III and JUDITH GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Garcia v. Kendall III
as 8:2023cv03188
Plaintiff:
Judith Garcia
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Rainey v. Bailey
as 1:2023cv03160
Plaintiff:
Frank V. Rainey
Defendant:
B. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Milligan v. May et al
as 1:2023cv02691
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Milligan
Defendant:
John Jeffrey May, Gary Day, Jennifer Day and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Everlake Life Insurance Company v. Ayd, III et al
as 1:2023cv02582
Plaintiff:
Everlake Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Frank J. Ayd, III, Frank J. Ayd, IV, Susan Ayd Chaudron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Thompson v. Austin et al
as 8:2023cv02458
Plaintiff:
Carrisa L. Thompson
Defendant:
The Honorable Lloyd J. Austin, III, Kendall Frank III and Physical Disability Board of Review
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moore v. Wilcox et al
as 1:2023cv01931
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Moore
Defendant:
Frank Wilcox, Robert Leonard and Brandon Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ni Fed. Question: Negotiable Instrument
Mpoy v. The State of Maryland et al
as 8:2023cv01927
Plaintiff:
Bruno K. Mpoy
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, Montgomery County, Maryland, Marcy Waxman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
