Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Gentry v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Devion Gentry
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Nottoway Correctional Center, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam Gentry v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02726
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. and Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adam Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry v. Samuels et al
as 3:2014cv00279
Plaintiff:
Sharon O'Dell Gentry
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, E. D. Wilson, Buklich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strouse v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2012cv00653
Petitioner:
James Strouse
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, E. D. Wilson, Bernardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Robinson v. Bartlow et al
as 3:2012cv00024
Defendant:
Kyle Bartlow, Does 1-5, Inclusive, Mariah Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
X v. United States Congress et al
as 3:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X
Defendant:
United States Congress, Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold E. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
X v. United States Congress et al
as 3:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X
Defendant:
United States Congress, Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold E. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00567
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
