Cases 11 - 20 of 46
BATTLE v. ADAMS et al
as 5:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
TERRY LEE BATTLE
Defendant:
VIRGIL L ADAMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeigler v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sir-Nicholas Zeigler
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections and Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 4:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
Arttie Price
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2016cv02579
Plaintiff:
Arttie Price
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wasif v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2015cv00422
Petitioner:
Mohammad Wasif
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wasif v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2015cv00081
Petitioner:
Mohammad Wasif
Respondent:
United States Of America, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bearden v. State of Georgia
as 1:2015cv02254
Petitioner:
Rodney Bearden
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, Albert Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Laughlin et al
as 4:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
David Timothy Moore
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin and Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Laughlin et al
as 3:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
David Timothy Moore
Defendant:
Vance Laughlin and Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILES v. SALES et al
as 5:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEE MILES, JR
Defendant:
TIMOTHY SALES, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
