Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Hierholzer et al v. Guzman et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Marty Hierholzer and MJL Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Isabel Guzman and Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Guzman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01436
Plaintiff:
Nury Guzman
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jimenez et al v. J A G Contractors Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Pedro Jimenez and Estanislao Rios
Defendant:
J A G Contractors Inc., Josue Guzman and Hensel Phelps Development, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
U.S. Department of Labor v. JAG Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor
Defendant:
JAG Contractors, Inc., Josue Guzman and Carlos Gomez
Healthy Fun One, Inc. v. Guzman
as 1:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Healthy Fun One, Inc.
Defendant:
Isabella Casillas Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lemus Guzman v. Perry
as 3:2021cv00664
Plaintiff:
Jose Rafael Lemus Guzman
Defendant:
Colonel Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00171
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Guzman v. Cantho Restaurant, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Cantho Restaurant, inc. and Cantho Restaurant, Inc. doing business as Huong Viet Restaurant
Plaintiff:
Leonida Guzman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
