Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Gee v. Sabol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00345
Plaintiff: David Gee
Defendant: Mary Sabol, Valquez, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAIRD et al v. PARK et al
as 2:2017cv00173
Plaintiff: LESLIE BAIRD and GEORGE BURDEN
Defendant: RICHARD K. PARK and GEE HO PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gee v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02361
Plaintiff: Diana Gee
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GEE v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv04319
Plaintiff: RUSSELL GEE
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00717
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GEE v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02058
Plaintiff: ERIN C. GEE
Defendant: ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEE v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv00830
Plaintiff: SHERRY MARIA GEE
Defendant: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gee v. Sabol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01184
Plaintiff: David Gee
Defendant: Mary Sabol, Doll, Trostle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02336
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCEACHIN & GEE ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP et al v. POGUST, BRASLOW & MILLROOD, LLC
as 2:2013cv06177
Plaintiff: MCEACHIN & GEE ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP and FARMERS LAW GROUP OF CONNECTICUT LLC
Defendant: POGUST, BRASLOW & MILLROOD, LLC
Counter_claimant: POGUST, BRASLOW & MILLROOD, LLC
Counter_defendant: FARMERS LAW GROUP OF CONNECTICUT LLC and MCEACHIN & GEE ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?