Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Sherman v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv01405
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frank Sherman, III
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. USA
as 3:2022cv01337
Petitioner:
Geoffrey Gordon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv01314
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Ned Lamont, William Tong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IOU Central, Inc. v. Lazy Dog Management, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
IOU Central, Inc. doing business as IOU Financial, Inc.
Defendant:
Lazy Dog Management, LLC doing business as Ole Dog Tavern, Christopher Delmonico, Niall O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Gordon v. Hess
as 3:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Michael Gordon
Respondent:
Hess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Clark et al v. Santander Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark, Lillian J. Clark and Estate of Lillian J. Clark
Defendant:
Santander Bank, N.A., Timothy Wennes, Pierre Habis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Callahan et al v. New Haven et al
as 3:2021cv01069
Plaintiff:
Tachica M. Callahan, Ronnjae T. Gordon, Ronnie T. Gordon, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department, New Haven Police Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Hodges v. Law Office of Mitchell Garabedian, et al
as 3:2020cv01510
Defendant:
Lynch, Traub, Keefe & Errante, P.C., Marisa Bellair, Law Office of Mitchell Garabedian and others
Plaintiff:
Schelle Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
