Cases 11 - 20 of 460
Kennedy v. Crews et al
as 0:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Scott Patrick Kennedy
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, David Green, Lt. Nathan Elam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Green
as 0:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Khalil Coleman
Defendant:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Green
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Khalil Coleman
Defendant:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullum v. Green
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Christopher McCullum
Respondent:
J. David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harmon et al v. Goodwin et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
I. H., S. H., Teresa M. Harmon and others
Defendant:
Hon. Lori Goodwin, Stephanie Willis, David Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Green v. Republic Services
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jeff Green
Defendant:
Republic Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Green v. BMW Financial Services et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jeff Green
Defendant:
BMW Financial Services, Ole Jensen and William E. Sicking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baker v. Green
as 3:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Eugene Lamont Baker
Respondent:
James David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mallory et al v. Smith et al
as 0:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
James Mallory, Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhhammad and Mrs. Porshia Moneice Mallory
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, John Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallory et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Mallory, Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhhammad and Mrs. Porshia Moneice Mallory
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, John Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
