Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Garrett et al v. Cardin Drive-In, Inc. et al (RLJ2)
as 3:2016cv00551
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Garrett , Amy Grubb , Jennifer Patrick and others
Defendant:
Cardin Drive-In, Inc. and Wilma Jean Cardin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hitchcock et al v. Cumberland University 403(B) DC Plan et al
as 3:2015cv01215
Plaintiff:
Eloise Hitchcock , Sheryl Kae and Robert Grubb
Defendant:
Cumberland University 403(B) DC Plan, Cumberland University and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Taylor v. Grubb & Associates (TV3)
as 3:2013cv00665
Plaintiff:
Dossie Taylor
Defendant:
Grubb & Associates
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Grubb v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2012cv00322
Plaintiff:
Tammy Yvonne Grubb
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Grubb v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Richard A Grubb
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC , Tanya Hollenbeck and Nathan L Horton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mosley v. Bowden et al
as 1:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Bobby James Mosley, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven S. Bowden, Charles Lee, Weakley E. Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell et al v. Puckett et al
as 1:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
William Russell , Michelle Smedley , Jocelyn Barby and others
Defendant:
William Puckett and Phil Grubb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. Warrick
as 2:2008cv02808
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Brandy Grubb
Defendant:
William Warrick, Jr.
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
