Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Gentry v. Hammond Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00400
Defendant:
Hammond Police Department and Lake County Sheriff
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gentry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Murray v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2018cv11561
Plaintiff:
Frederick Murray
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Sex Offender Registry Board, Jeff Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kudla v. Hammond City of et al
as 2:2018cv00419
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jean Kudla
Defendant:
Denise Szany, William Reshkin, Hammond Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smelko v. Hammond Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv00385
Defendant:
Hammond Police Department, Eusebio Gonzalez and Anthony M Ferrarini
Plaintiff:
Robert William Smelko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Radovick v. Hammond Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
Michael Radovick
Defendant:
Hammond Police Department, Mark Detterline, David Pardonek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crossley v. Hammond City of et al
as 2:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
Bennie Crossley
Defendant:
Hammond City of , Hammond Police Department and William Reshkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Oscar Dantzler v. EEOC, et al
as 12-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oscar Dantzler
Defendant - Appellee:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Keith Hills, Agent Does One-Five and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alicea v. Hammond Police Department et al
as 2:2011cv00445
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Alicea
Defendant:
Hammond Police Department and Officer Alverez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barajas v. Siegfried et al
as 2:2010cv00486
Plaintiff:
Alex Barajas
Defendant:
Officer M Siegfried and Hammond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
