Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Leask et al v. Walcott et al
as 1:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
Thomas Leask and Brenda Leask
Defendant:
Howard Walcott, Elizabeth Walcott, Elizabeth Walcott, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Torrence v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2016cv00065
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harrold Torrence
Defendant:
C. Sullivan, Inmate Cell #9T Mike Mod, Hutchison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank v. State of AK et al
as 3:2015cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kevin Howard Frank
Defendant:
State of AK and Court System and Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 3:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dash v. United Services Automobile Association
as 3:2014cv00046
Plaintiff:
Howard Dash
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. M/V THE PAULA LEE et al
as 3:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Howard Freemont Baker
Defendant:
M/V THE PAULA LEE and The Dutra Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Perales v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00182
Defendant:
Richard Bruce Cheney, Peter Hoekstra, Christopher Samuel Bond and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodford v. Tesoro Companies, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00044
Plaintiff:
Howard Woodford
Defendant:
Tesoro Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Quindell Queen, Inc. v. The Carrington Co. et al
as 3:1978cv00178
Plaintiff:
Quindell Queen, Inc.
Defendant:
The Carrington Co., Howard Cooper Corporation, Clough Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Howard v. Northern Seas, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
Noriss Howard, Noriss Howard and Noriss Howard
Defendant:
Northern Seas, Inc. and F/V Aluet Mistress
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
