Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Seiko Epson Corporation, et al v. Audoormatics USA, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv11148
Defendant:
Lee's Collection, Inc., Ivy Chen, Audoormatics USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Epson Portland Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation and Epson America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Achong et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12144
Plaintiff:
Rona Smith, Richard Nagle, Shquan Mais-Williams and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Westport Insurance Corporation v. Law Office of Marilyn Thomassen, PC
as 2:2018cv00751
Defendant:
Wei Hong Chen, Li Ping Fang, Jian Hong Fei and others
Plaintiff:
Westport Insurance Corporation
Westport Insurance Corporation v. Law Office of Marilyn Thomassen, PC
as 8:2018cv00170
Defendant:
Law Office of Marilyn Thomassen, PC, Wu Hua Yuan, Ming Xu and others
Plaintiff:
Wesport Insurance Corporation and Westport Insurance Corporation
Undetermined:
Jean M Lawler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Li v. Chang Lung Group Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06722
Defendant:
Chang Lung Group Inc. and Tommy Zhou
Plaintiff:
Jian Hua Li
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Li et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv06392
Plaintiff:
Yan Nan Chen, Yan Qing Chen and Hua Li
Defendant:
James B. Comey, Jeh Charles Johnson, David L. Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07436
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv06468
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", customerfirst2015, to-the-better and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
