Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 68
David Cain, Jr. v. Donald Hudson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1765
Respondent / Appellee: DONALD HUDSON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID CAIN, JR.
David Cain, Jr. v. Chris Rivers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1421
Respondent / Appellee: DONALD HUDSON, Warden and CHRIS RIVERS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID CAIN, JR.
Jackson v. Hudson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3053
Respondent / Appellee: DON HUDSON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL JACKSON
Dembry v. Hudson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3031
Petitioner / Appellant: EDWARD KEITH DEMBRY
Respondent / Appellee: DON HUDSON, Warden, USP-Leavenworth
Mitchell Farkas v. Donald Hudson
as 19-5887
Respondent / Appellee: DONALD HUDSON, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: MITCHELL LEON FARKAS
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant: MICHELLE GONYEA, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Ray Brook, f/k/a FNU Gaunyea, FNU KUZNECOW, (first name unknown) Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, K. LEWIS, Physician's Assistant, FCI Berlin and others
Defendant - Appellee: E. L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin, a/k/a Esker Lee Tatum, DAN SULLIVAN, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Berlin, WANDA MULLINS, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin and others
Interested Party: BRIAN PATTERSON
Lugo v. Hudson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-2302
Petitioner - Appellant: Daniel Lugo
Respondent - Appellee: D. Hudson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Ray Brook
In re: Daniel Lugo
as 14-1434
Petitioner: Daniel Lugo
Respondent: D. Hudson, Warden, FCI Ray Brook
Northrop v. Hudson
as 13-2687
Petitioner - Appellant: Aaron Ben Northrop
Respondent - Appellee: Hudson, Warden
Chetankumar Patel v. Stuart Hudson
as 13-3310
Petitioner - Appellant: CHETANKUMAR PRAVIN PATEL
Respondent - Appellee: STUART HUDSON, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?