Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Gerasimchuk v. Breighner et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Yekatrina Gerasimchuk
Defendant:
Frank Breighner, J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. and J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Woodson v. Dye et al
as 7:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. T. Dye, Ms. Sater, Mr. Widener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tolbert v. Quesenberry et al
as 7:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Shawn Tolbert
Defendant:
Nurse Deborah Quesenberry, Nurse Lisa Fergusun, LPN Samantha Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Hunt
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Henry County Sheriff's Office et al
as 7:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Zachery Tyler Conner
Defendant:
Henry County Sheriff's Office, Henry County Adult Detention Center, Sheriff L. A. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hunt v. Clarke
as 1:2022cv00974
Plaintiff:
Frank Junior Hunt
Defendant:
Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00233
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hunt v. White
as 7:2021cv00534
Petitioner:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Respondent:
Rick White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
