Cases 11 - 20 of 123
Cray v. Hamilton
as 6:2023cv00074
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Cray
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Laura Neal
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Board Of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County, Jacob Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamilton v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00434
Petitioner:
Anthony Emmett Hamilton, Jr
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Nor T. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mark Knutson, David Louthan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00095
Petitioner:
Raphael R Hamilton
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Clervrain et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00326
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, John M. O'Connor, Paul B. Hunker, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brauning v. State of Oklahoma
as 5:2021cv00878
Petitioner:
Justin Brauning
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brauning v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2021cv00353
Petitioner:
Justin Brauning
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chrismon v. Hamilton
as 6:2021cv00251
Petitioner:
Keith Roy Chrismon
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
