Cases 11 - 20 of 32
ROGERS v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2012cv01176
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS and BRUCE HELMING
Petitioner:
STEVEN ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HELMS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00941
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. HELMS, JR.
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MCGRAW v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2012cv00849
Defendant:
ALAN ALSIP, BARR, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MCGRAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2012cv00443
Defendant:
LINDA ASHBY, JEFF D. BALLENGER, MARY BLOMQUIST and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HULL v. BUSS et al
as 1:2012cv00340
Defendant:
EDWIN G. BUSS, KEITH BUTTS, ALLEN FINNAN and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. HULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HELM v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00134
Respondent:
MR. BUTTS
Petitioner:
BRYAN HELM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Helm et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01206
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Acevez, Frederick R. Aldrich, Merlin Alexander and others
Defendant:
Alderwoods Group, Inc., Alderwoods Group, LLC, Paul A. Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
LEWIS v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2011cv00174
Defendant:
RONDLE ANDERSON, B. HELMING and STANLEY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
v. YAMOBI et al
as 2:2011cv00001
Defendant:
GARY BRENNAN, BRUCE HELMING and STATE OF INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff:
PRINCE RO'DJRELL YAMOBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
