Cases 11 - 20 of 43,554
Hill v. Wellpath Medical Provider et al
as 3:2025cv00333
Plaintiff:
Hubert Duwayne Hill
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical Provider, Cleveland Rayford, Dr. Ampadu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal-Hill v. Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium
as 1:2025cv00436
Petitioner:
DeAndre Lenier Neal-Hill
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Hill v. Millbank et al
as 2:2025cv00782
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
Nicholas Millbank, Dennis Cemo and Jonathan Eslick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hill v. Cemo
as 2:2025cv00789
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
Dennis Cemo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamal Soloman v. Barbara M. Scheper et al
as 2:2025cv02016
Plaintiff:
Gamal Soloman
Defendant:
Barbara M. Scheper, Brenda J. Penny, Karen E. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Khan v. Half Hollow Hills Central School District et al
as 1:2025cv01324
Plaintiff:
Jane Khan
Defendant:
Half Hollow Hills Central School District, Michael Catapano and Patrick Harrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnnie Callahan, III v. USA
as 25-10743
Petitioner:
JOHNNIE HILL CALLAHAN, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Salido v. Hill et al
as 3:2025cv00561
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Salido
Defendant:
James Hill, Steven Stallings and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Half Hollow Hills Central School District et al
as 2:2025cv01324
Plaintiff:
Jane Khan
Defendant:
Half Hollow Hills Central School District, Dr. Michael Catapano and Dr. Patrick Harrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
