Cases 11 - 20 of 26
NISHIHARA v. ATLAS ENERGY, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01526
Plaintiff:
LANCE NISHIHARA
Defendant:
ATLAS ENERGY, INC., EDWARD E. COHEN, JONATHAN Z. COHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILAZZO et al v. HOLTZ et al
as 2:2010cv03479
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE MILAZZO and BENEDICT MILAZZO
Defendant:
DAVID HOLTZ , E. LAWRENCE LANGAN, III , ERIN C. LANGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLTZ v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv61938
Plaintiff:
ALLEN HOLTZ
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY , ACANDS INC, CROSSFIELD CSR LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLTZ v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv71940
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. HOLTZ and JAMES W. HOLTZ
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, CAREY CANADA INC, ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Gray v. Wakefield et al
as 3:2009cv00979
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Gray
Defendant:
David J. Wakefield, Raymond M. Lawler, Michael Harlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAdams v. Lawler et al
as 3:2009cv00882
Plaintiff:
Alfred O. McAdams
Defendant:
Lawler, Dorina Varner, Lt. Holtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Sneath et al
as 1:2009cv00154
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Green
Defendant:
Det. Sneath, Lt. Holtz, Supt. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Washington v. Grace et al
as 4:2008cv01283
Plaintiff:
Henry Unseld Washington
Defendant:
James L. Grace, David J. Wakefield, R. M. Lawler and others
Amicu:
G C Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Beard et al
as 3:2008cv01135
Plaintiff:
Gregory G. Brown
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, -, R. M. Lawer, Connie Green and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TAYLOR v. ARANEDA et al
as 1:2008cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dorothy O. Taylor
Defendant:
Araneda, Mills, Auman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
