Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Atlas Copco Compressors LLC v. Industrial Compressor Solutions Inc
as 6:2019cv00275
Defendant:
Industrial Compressor Solutions Inc and ICS Upstate
Plaintiff:
Atlas Copco Compressors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
The Ice Box Company Inc v. Clark Associates Inc
as 4:2017cv03042
Plaintiff:
The Ice Box Company Inc
Defendant:
Clark Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Edmunds v. Nestle USA Inc
as 7:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
Macio Edmunds, Jr
Defendant:
Nestle Dreyers Ice Cream Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zajac v. Ice House on Bohicket LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01869
Plaintiff:
Lauren Zajac and Jasmine Gabriel Jordan
Defendant:
Ice House on Bohicket LLC, Cecil Crowley, Dianne Crowley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv03714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv03713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harris v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 7:2012cv03291
Plaintiff:
Lee Marvin Harris, Sr
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security and ICE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983 f3A Release of Government Seized Property
Revolutions Medical Corporation v. Strategic Product Development Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02793
Plaintiff:
Revolutions Medical Corporation
Defendant:
Strategic Product Development Inc, Rink Development Company LLC, Ice Huts Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
