Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Bobo v. Irvin et al
as 3:2017cv00568
Plaintiff:
Jason J. Bobo
Defendant:
L. T. Irvin, K. Gooden and J. Leaper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Storey et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Robert Irvin Storey and Leta M. Storey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Clark v. Banks et al
as 1:2016cv00208
Plaintiff:
Irvin Kenneth Clark
Defendant:
Jacquline Banks, R. Woodall and Mike Hatten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almore et al v. John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC et al
as 2:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
James Allen Almore , Solomon Sylvester Barger , Douglas E. Beasley, Sr. and others
Defendant:
John M. O'Quinn & Associates, PLLC , John M. O'Quinn & Associates, L.L.P. , John M. O'Quinn, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Woodall et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Ronald E. Woodall, Charlene McCleave, James Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hazel v. Warden, FCI Yazoo City Low
as 3:2015cv00907
Plaintiff:
Irvin Maurice Hazel
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Yazoo City Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hill v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Marshall Fisher, Jerry Williams, Raymond Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 5:2014cv00085
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Frank Shaw, Unknown Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvine v. Denmark
as 5:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Edward Irvine
Defendant:
Johnnie Denmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vance et al v. Yazoo County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Vance , Andrew Vance and Nicole Vance
Defendant:
Yazoo County, Mississippi, Jake Sheriff, Tommy Irvine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
