Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Brown v. Siever et al
as 2:2021cv00587
Plaintiff:
Ryheem Brown
Defendant:
Travis Siever, Ivan Gilmore and Mr. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Squire v. Siever et al
as 2:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
V. Squire
Defendant:
Travis Siever, Ivan Gilmore and Mr. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Harvey Spencer
as 21-7470
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HARVEY SPENCER, Chief Secretary, MARCUS ELAM, VADOC Eastern Regional Administrator, G. HOLLOWAY, VADOC Eastern Regional Ombudsman and others
David Meyers v. D. Roundtree
as 21-7469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
D. ROUNDTREE, Captain, FISCAL TECH KRUSE, J. RANDOLPH, Accountant and others
David Meyers v. A. Miller
as 21-7457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MILLER, Mail Clerk of Sussex I State Prison, CITY OF WAVERLY, VIRGINIA, IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden and others
Firewalker-Fields v. Elam et al
as 1:2021cv01113
Plaintiff:
David N. Firewalker-Fields
Defendant:
Marcus Elam, Ivan Gilmore and Ms. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emmitt Roscoe v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7025
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMITT G. ROSCOE
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, DAVID A. ROBINSON, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Meyers v. Special Needs X-Press, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00342
Defendant:
Special Needs X-Press, Inc., Kruse, Ivan Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Special Needs X-Press, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02600
Defendant:
Special Needs X-Press, Inc., Ms. A. Miller, Martin Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. D. Roundtree
as 21-6723
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN BRYANT, Warden, FISCAL TECH KRUSE, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
