Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00732
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
John Doe v. William Barr, et al
as 20-16710
Respondent:
TONY H. PHAM, DAVID JENNINGS, in his official capacity as San Francisco Field Office Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and others
Petitioner:
JOHN DOE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11582
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tawalbeh v. Wolf et al
as 7:2020cv00397
Defendant:
Mr. Crawford, Mr. Elliot, James Mullins and others
Plaintiff:
Fahed Tawalbeh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04382
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00093
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mario Landeros Jimenez v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-15533
Respondent:
ERIK BONNAR, Director of the San Francisco Field Officer, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, MATTHEW ALBENCE, Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE and others
Petitioner:
MARIO LANDEROS JIMENEZ
Ruiz Hernandez v. Immigration Custom Enforcement (ICE)
as 2:2020cv14071
Defendant:
Immigration Custom Enforcement (ICE)
Plaintiff:
Henry Adonias Ruiz Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00164
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Roblero-Chavez v. Immigration Custom Enforcement (ICE) et al
as 2:2019cv14344
Plaintiff:
Saulo David Roblero-Chavez
Defendant:
Immigration Custom Enforcement (ICE) and Martin County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
