Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Gentry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 8:2018cv01995
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Veronda J. Gentry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01671
Defendant:
Adams, Barrit, F. Dreesen and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Allen et al
as 2:2017cv01612
Defendant:
Sgt Allen, F. Dreesen, J. Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Cox et al
as 2:2017cv01002
Defendant:
Lt. M. Adams, R. Aranas, J Borrowman and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald C. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Gentry, et al v. FHLMC, et al
as 15-1424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES T. GENTRY and BRENDA J. GENTRY
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, FHLMC (FREDDIE MAC) MULTICLASS CERTIFICATES SERIES 3305 TRUST (REMIC), WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and others
Johnson v. Cox et al
as 2:2014cv01326
Defendant:
Joseph Abrams, M. Adams, M. Awedainani and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barraza v. Gentry et al
as 2:2014cv01185
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and J. Gentry
Petitioner:
Jessica Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jessica Barraza v. J. Gentry, et al
as 14-15996
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSICA BARRAZA
Respondent - Appellee:
J. GENTRY and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEVADA
Barraza v. Gentry et al
as 2:2014cv00766
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and J. Gentry
Petitioner:
Jessica Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jiles v. Williams et al
as 2:2014cv00712
Defendant:
Cheryl Dressler, J. Gentry, B. Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jiles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
