Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
JAMES v. BUSH et al
as 2:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JAMES
Defendant:
BUSH, J. M. BOYLES and B. D. HEIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Massaquoi v. McConaughey et al
as 3:2017cv00938
Plaintiff:
Manna Massaquoi
Defendant:
J. McConaughey, T. Deljanovan, S. A. Seese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Mooney et al
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Richard Sears
Defendant:
Vincent Mooney, Trisha Kelley, Dorina Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acuity v. Barr et al
as 3:2016cv01699
Plaintiff:
Acuity
Defendant:
James M. Barr, Barr Construction and J & M Construction Specialty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BOOZER v. RIGGENBACH et al
as 2:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LONEY BOOZER
Defendant:
ANGELA RIGGENBACH, L.S. KERNS-BARR, MARK DIALESANDRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bragg v. Jones et al
as 4:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
Cassidy D. Bragg
Defendant:
John D. Jones and J&M Property Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GEORGE et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv00115
Plaintiff:
LEONA GEORGE
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC. , ARMSTRONG PUMPS, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
EATON CORPORATION and CBS CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
EATON CORPORATION , A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
