Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 53
PENDLETON v. TICE et al
as 3:2019cv00038
Defendant: MR. KNAPP, ERIC W. TICE, DAN CAIRO and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PENDLETON v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2018cv01171
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant: STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PENDLETON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2018cv00078
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PENDLETON v. ZAPPALA et al
as 2:2018cv00044
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant: STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. , JAMES MCGEE , TONY CONDEMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Michael Pendleton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1218
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Nominal Respondent: KIM R. GIBSON
PENDLETON v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00258
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PENDLETON v. TODD et al
as 2:2016cv00587
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant: RANDAL B. TODD, RAYMOND A. NOVAK, KATE BARKMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Michael Pendleton
as 15-2631
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: GERALD ROZUM, Superintendent at SCI Somerset
Nominal Respondent: KIM R. GIBSON
In re: Michael Pendleton
as 15-2414
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
In re: Michael Pendleton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3617
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: GERALD ROZUM, Superintendent at SCI Sonerset

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?