Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Craig v. CenturyLink Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01005
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Craig, Amalgamated Bank, Laborers Pension Trust Fund - Detroit & Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Glen F Post, III, R Stewart Ewing, Jr and CenturyLink Inc
Petitioner:
Tae Yi, Mark D Alger, Essex Lacy and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Amarendra Thummeti and Don J Scott
Respondent:
Inter-Marketing Group U S A Inc
Consolidated Defendant:
David D Cole
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Muhammad v. Wilson
as 3:2012cv00740
Plaintiff:
Vanyel Muhammad
Defendant:
J. Scott Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Cain et al
as 2:2012cv02742
Plaintiff:
Elliot J. Scott
Defendant:
N Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawes v. Dupuy et al
as 3:2011cv00142
Defendant:
Ulyses Addison, Jr., Kyle Alford, All Current City Council Members and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Dawes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2010cv00381
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn J Scott
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company et al
as 3:2009cv00912
Plaintiff:
Gloria J Scott and Gloria J Scott
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, Affion Business Group, L.L.C and Merrick Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Brown v. Dept. of Health & Hospital et al
as 3:2008cv00065
Plaintiff:
Terry Lloyd Brown
Defendant:
Dept. of Health & Hospital, John Thompson, Jr, Herman Soong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Cain et al
as 2:2007cv06430
Plaintiff:
Elliot J. Scott
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
