Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Burnett v Brown et al
as 3:2019cv00649
Defendant:
Kristine St. Martin, Richard Brown, A. Everly and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Keith Burnett, Jr
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNETT v. ANTON et al
as 2:2019cv00404
Defendant:
J. LYTTLE, J. ANTON and RON NEAL
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNETT v. BUSS et al
as 2:2019cv00343
Defendant:
DEBBIE ABRAM, RICHARD BROWN, RON NEAL and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNETT v. KELSEY et al
as 2:2019cv00364
Defendant:
J. LYTTLE, A. KELSEY, KRISTINE ST. MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL BURNETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNETT v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv00371
Defendant:
KRISTINE ST. MARTIN, RICHARD BROWN, A. EVERLY and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. RANEY et al
as 2:2019cv00135
Defendant:
A. BENEFIEL, R. BROWN, K. MCDONALD and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHASE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv00207
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH, J. R. SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and others
Petitioner:
KENNETH CHASE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ybarra v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00105
Plaintiff:
Randy Russell Ybarra and Randy R Ybarra
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Harman, Neal and others
Undetermined:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00868
Defendant:
Superintendent Ron Neal, Jane Doe or John Doe, C Dustin and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Ronald J Pierce
Undetermined:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv02674
Defendant:
DOE KELLY, WORTHMAN DOE, DOE HELBERT and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.Q. BERRY, JR. and EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
