Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Brown v. Lancaster et al
as 3:2014cv01180
Plaintiff:
Alton D. Brown
Defendant:
Gary L. Lancaster, J. Curtis Joyner, Thomas J. Rueter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alton Brown v. Gary Lancaster, et al
as 14-2670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER, MICHAEL KUNZ and others
Alton Brown v. USDC EDPA, et al
as 14-1834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
BROWN v. LANCASTER et al
as 2:2014cv00297
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Patrick McPherron
as 14-1400
Petitioner:
In re: PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Nominal Respondent:
THOMAS J. RUETER and J. CURTIS JOYNER
Brown v. Lancaster et al
as 3:2014cv00222
Plaintiff:
Alton D Brown
Defendant:
Gary L. Lancaster, J. Curtis Joyner, Thomas J Rueter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LANCASTER et al
as 2:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT et al
as 2:2013cv07229
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Alton Brown
as 13-4200
Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FELIPE ARIAS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC and others
Nominal Respondent:
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO and THOMAS J. RUETER
BROWN v. JOYNER et al
as 2:2013cv04686
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant:
J. CURTIS JOYNER, EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
