Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Dunmore v. Atchison et al
as 3:2013cv01341
Plaintiff:
James E Dunmore
Defendant:
Mike Atchison, Richard Harrington, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Greensfelder Hemker & Gale et al
as 3:2013cv00954
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
Greensfelder Hemker & Gale and Brant M Feltner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Brown et al
as 3:2012cv50425
Plaintiff:
David Joshua Brown
Defendant:
David James Brown and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaczor v. City Of Des Plaines et al
as 1:2011cv00087
Defendant:
City Of Des Plaines , Paul Burger , Michael Holdman and others
Plaintiff:
Danuta Kaczor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Ryker et al
as 3:2010cv00397
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
Lee Ryker, Donald Gaetz and Christine Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Eyecare Centers of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01130
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
Eyecare Centers of America, Inc. and Eyemasters, Inc. d/b/a Visionworks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hollander v. The Esate of James Brown et al
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyne Hollander
Defendant:
The Esate of James Brown, Adele J. Pope, Robert L. Buchanan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brown v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00240
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc, Roger E. Walker, Jr., Ronald J Meek and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Doe et al
as 1:2008cv01324
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
John Doe, . Jarrett, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Starks et al v. Davidson et al
as 3:2008cv00659
Plaintiff:
Larry E Starks, Jr, Craig L Spencer, James Brown and others
Defendant:
James J. Davidson, Jeffrey Parker, Ron Vitale and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
