Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Burns v. Polk et al
as 4:2021cv00602
Respondent:
Michael N. Bates, Balden B Polk, Ralston D Marshall and others
Petitioner:
James Edward Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quintela v. Meyer et al
as 6:2021cv00310
Defendant:
Theodore Nasiotis, Dr. Randall D. Meyer, Heather Rios and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Quintela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potts v. Webb et al
as 1:2021cv00121
Defendant:
B Collier, G Beto, G Webb and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Potts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNS v. POLK et al
as 5:2021cv00045
Respondent:
Michael N. Bates, Balden B Polk and Ralston D Marshall
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McNeal v. Navarro County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
James Edward McNeal
Defendant:
Navarro County Sheriff Department, John Doe, Sgt. Jeff Harbuck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00240
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
James Edward Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Potts v. Wainwright et al
as 4:2020cv04043
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Billy Haskle and Dale Wainwright
Plaintiff:
James Edward Potts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potts v. Wainwright et al
as 1:2020cv00398
Respondent:
Warden Beto Unit - Tennessee Colony
Plaintiff:
James Edward Potts
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Billy Haskle and Dale Wainwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallings v. Chavez et al
as 6:2017cv00123
Defendant:
City of Waco, Manuel Chavez, John or Jane Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Stallings, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Edward Striblin v. Bobby Lumpkin
as 5:2020cv00993
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
James Edward Striblin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
