Cases 11 - 20 of 28
ROWE v. DILLOW et al
as 1:2017cv03288
Defendant:
BROWN, BURKHARDT, ALICIA D. COOMER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWE v. COOMER et al
as 1:2017cv00599
Defendant:
BRUBAKER, ALICIA D. COOMER, CORIZON HEALTH INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ROWE v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2016cv02557
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FORESTERS LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY v. GAFFNEY et al
as 1:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
FORESTERS LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY
Defendant:
KELLEY A. GAFFNEY and JEFFREY A. ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
ROWE v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv01332
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROWE v. BROWN et al
as 1:2011cv01110
Defendant:
AUTUMN BROWN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CARLILE, SERGEANT FLOCKHART and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
ROWE v. HYSELL et al
as 1:2011cv00975
Defendant:
LISA GIBSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HYSELL, MARY MANSFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
ROWE v. SUPERINTENDENT OF PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILTY
as 1:2010cv01512
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ALLEN ROWE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT OF PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rowe v. Superintendent
as 3:2010cv00387
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Allen Rowe
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rowe v. Morton et al
as 3:2010cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Rowe
Defendant:
Howard Morton and Pamela Banes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
