Cases 11 - 20 of 170
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Miller v. Hartfield et al
as 3:2023cv03041
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Miller
Defendant:
Joshua Hartfield and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Doe
as 5:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Reihon Dawson
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Joiner v. King et al
as 3:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Latoya Joiner
Defendant:
William King, Arthur James, Jeremy Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn v. Farris et al
as 4:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Charles Dunn
Defendant:
Jeremy Farris and Nations Roof, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Donston v. Cain et al
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Eric Lovan Donston
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Donald Faucett, Gloria Perry and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heimbach v. Brumfield et al
as 5:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Charles Heimbach
Defendant:
James Brumfield, Herbert Young, Richard Bynam and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mairidith v. USA
as 1:2023cv00086
Petitioner:
Jeremy K. Mairidith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Travis v. Hall Tires and Collection, LLC
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Debra Travis
Defendant:
Hall Tires and Collection, LLC and Jeremy Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Price v. City of Natchez, Mississippi et al
as 5:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Nieger Price
Defendant:
City of Natchez, Mississippi, Officer Jeremy Sherry, Former Chief Joseph Daughtry, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
