Cases 11 - 20 of 62
In re: Kenneth Lewi
as 17-3101
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant - Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CARVAJAL, M.D., LAURA A. MASON and others
Nominal Respondent:
FREDA L. WOLFSON
Dougherty et al v. Dupes et al
as 1:2017cv01541
Plaintiff:
Keith Dougherty, Brent Frey, Erica Frey and others
Defendant:
Jared Dupes , Commonwealth Court Clerk, Christopher Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. SESSIONS, ET AL.,
as 3:2017cv05475
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, THOMAS KANE, CARVAJAL, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: John Curran, III, et al
as 17-2434
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN F. CURRAN, III
Respondent - Respondent:
NORTHRUP GRUMMAN CORP, BAE SYSTEMS TACTICAL VEHICLE SYSTEMS LP, PRATT & MILLER INC and others
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
GARRETT v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv02924
Plaintiff:
ALAN D. GARRETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY, JEROME B. SIMANDLE, MAGGIE F. MOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Shaun Rosiere
as 17-1092
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: SHAUN ROSIERE
Defendant - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
In re: Sean Souel
as 16-4423
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: SEAN A. SOUELS
Defendant - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
ORTEGA v. SIMANDLE
as 2:2016cv04181
Petitioner:
GIRSON JASON ORTEGA
Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortega v. Simandle
as 1:2016cv01402
Petitioner:
Girson J. Ortega
Respondent:
Jerome B. Simandle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Sean A. Souel
as 16-2305
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: SEAN A. SOUELS
Defendant - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
