Cases 11 - 20 of 921
Tian et al v. Liangtse KG Wellness One LLC et al
as 1:2024cv05519
Defendant:
XIAOZHE Liu, LIANGTSE KG WELLNESS ONE LLC, Hui JING ZHU and others
Plaintiff:
Guang GUO JIANG, SHU LIAN Feng, Xiao Qing Tian and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Yun Deng v. Slates, et al.
as 24-4119
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 25, inclusive, JING-SHENG LI, an individual, JING WANG, an individual and others
Claimant:
RONALD P. SLATES, Proposed Intervenor-Plaintiff and RONALD P. SLATES, PC, Proposed Intervenor-Plaintiff
Plaintiff:
DANIEL YUN DENG, an individual
Javier v. Bob's Shanghai 66 Bistro, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01943
Plaintiff:
Benito Sanchez Javier
Defendant:
Bob S. Liu, Jing Yao Wang, William Tseun-Lin La and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jing v. Garland
as 24-9540
Petitioner:
SHUANGFA JING
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Hu, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3611
Petitioner:
JING HU, JIADI HU and WENJING SUN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sunghee Park v. Jing Yan Yu
as 2:2024cv04792
Plaintiff:
Sunghee Park
Defendant:
Jing Yan Yu
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
-Scott v. Richards et al
as 3:2024cv03398
Defendant:
Jing Zhao and John S. Richards
Plaintiff:
Christopher -Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04694
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
DUQUETTE v. HUANG et al
as 2:2024cv06668
Plaintiff:
ERIC DUQUETTE
Defendant:
SHANCHUN HUANG, FUTURE FINTECH GROUP, INC., JOHNSON LAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
