Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Cook v. Gilles et al
as 7:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
John Lee Cook
Defendant:
George D. Jody Gilles and Gary Painter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cockerham, Jr. v. Braggs et al
as 3:2017cv00160
Respondent:
Warden Braggs, Rachel Chapa, Asst. Warden Shacks and others
Petitioner:
John Lee Cockerham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2016cv00403
Petitioner:
John Lee Thomas
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
King v. United States Of America Do not docket in this case. Docket entries should be made in 2:15cr574.
as 2:2016cv00434
Petitioner:
John Lee King
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. Stephen
as 1:2016cv00066
Petitioner:
John Lee Thomas
Respondent:
William Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peppar v. The City of San Antonio, Texas et al
as 5:2016cv00221
Defendant:
John Lee and The City of San Antonio, Texas
Plaintiff:
Diane Peppar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. San Antonio Police Department et al
as 5:2016cv00158
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, John Lee and San Antonio Police Department
Plaintiff:
Elena Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cockerham v. Willis
as 3:2015cv00382
Petitioner:
John Lee Cockerham, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Respondent:
Warden J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2015cv00311
Petitioner:
John Lee Johnson
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Posey v. United States Of America
as 7:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
John Lee Posey
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
