Cases 11 - 20 of 20
RIVADENEIRA v. GRAMP et al
as 2:2021cv01455
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN JONATHAN GRAMP
Petitioner:
ELMO RIVADENEIRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CASTILLO v. GRAMP et al
as 2:2020cv20398
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and JONATHAN GRAMP
Petitioner:
JUAN CASTILLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMART v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2020cv06598
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN SMART and ZEDEKIAH TESHUVAH
Defendant:
JONATHAN GRAMP, MARCUS O. HICKS and PHILLIP D. MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSSINGER v. GRAMP et al
as 1:2020cv05600
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and JONATHAN GRAMP
Petitioner:
GEORGE S. BUSSINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARCHESE v. GRAMP et al.
as 3:2020cv01651
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ADMINISTRATOR, GURBIR S. GREWAL and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. MARCHESE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROUSE v. DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY et al
as 2:2018cv17026
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANANCY and JONATHAN GRAMP
Petitioner:
TERRY C ROUSE, SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCMILLAN v. COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2018cv13379
Defendant:
Mr. STEVEN JOHNSON, SCO. SELBY, SCO. MITROSKY and others
Plaintiff:
MR. DONTA MCMILLAN and DONTA MCMILLAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv10390
Plaintiff:
SHAMSIDDIN ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN FALVEY, LINDA SANTORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGLIAROLI v. AHSAN et al
as 3:2018cv09683
Plaintiff:
DAVID PAGLIAROLI
Defendant:
ABU AHSAN, DONIQUE IVERY, ALEJANDINA SUMICAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NEALS v. STROMBERG et al
as 3:2016cv07141
Plaintiff:
TIVON NEALS
Defendant:
FRANCINE STROMBERG , GARY LANIGAN , STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
