Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Gonzalez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2021cv00351
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Respondent:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin, James Bowman and others
Defendant:
Christopher Jaynes, Cecil Hastings and Patrick Shumate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2021cv02777
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bobby Lumpkin, Warden James Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv00853
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 5:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzales v. Barrett et al
as 6:2020cv00782
Defendant:
Timothy Barrett and Juan Avila
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez and Jose Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cepeda et al v. World Atlantic Leasing LLC
as 1:2020cv00064
Plaintiff:
Sotero Cepeda, Minerva Garcia, Dror Saar and others
Defendant:
Caribbean Sun Airlines, Inc. d/b/a World Atlantic Airlines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. Earthcare Management, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv04057
Defendant:
Brent Abshire and Earthcare Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gonzalez v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 6:2019cv00468
Defendant:
Director TDCJ - CID
Petitioner:
Raul Jose Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 1:2019cv00521
Petitioner:
Raul Jose Gonzalez
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Chandler et al
as 3:2019cv01232
Defendant:
Reba Chandler and Billy Chandler, Jr
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Gonzalez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
