Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02605
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gibens et al v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Hoist Liftruck Mfg LLC, Woodforest National Bank and others
Defendant:
Premier Credit of North America LLC, Porter County Circuit Court Judge Pro Tem, Carrie N Crider and others
Plaintiff:
Reactive Power LLC and John Gibens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
REYNOLDS v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv01261
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, SETERUS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD J. REYNOLDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Wakley et al v. Kammeyer et al
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Victor Wakley, Julie Wakley and Devon Wakley
Defendant:
W Randall Kammeyer, Krista Kammeyer Motter , JP Morgan Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00049
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02281
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
