Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Logan v. Clarke et al
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Orell L. Logan
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, James E. Parks, Ronald Angolone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Meyers v. Pitney et al
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Muriel Pitney, Donald Lemons, Beth Cobell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. JTP Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03450
Plaintiff:
Mason Hall
Defendant:
JTP Enterprises LLC doing business as Cozy Inn, James Thomas Parks and Gloria J. Parks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Owen v. Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv06176
Defendant:
Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd., Lund Enterprises Corp., James Jay Park and others
Plaintiff:
Jeff M. Owen
Petitioner:
Ahmed F Huq and Robert Partovy
Huq v. Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv06864
Defendant:
Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd., Lund Enterprises Corp., James Jay Park and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Huq
Muller et al v. Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv05910
Plaintiff:
Eric Muller
Defendant:
Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd., James Jay Park, Scot Evans and others
PARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63194
Plaintiff:
JAMES DALTON PARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. Director of Action Alliance Commonwealth of VAPREA
as 21-6672
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER BROWN, SXI Intel Officer, PEODE, SX1 Physician, MAJOR RUFFIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Brown
as 21-6669
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DIAL, A. WELLINTON, UNIT MANAGER J. BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
