Cases 11 - 20 of 30
MITCHELL v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05445
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MITCHELL
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARINELLI et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05215
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. MARINELLI, TEDOR DAVIDO, MELVIN KNIGHT and others
Defendant:
JOHN E WETZEL, GEORGE M LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REID et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05108
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY REID, AARON JONES, CHRISTOPHER RONEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE M. LITTLE, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARTZ v. BLAKEY et al
as 2:2020cv04290
Respondent:
PATRICIA MCNAMARA, PATRICIA MAISANO, JOSEPH MEOLA and others
Petitioner:
TRUSTEE EDWARD JAMES ARTZ
CALABRESE v. CALABRESE et al
as 2:2017cv04231
Plaintiff:
TARA CALABRESE
Defendant:
ROBERT CALABRESE, MARLA S. LAYNAS , NADINE COLGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yun v. Gladiacoin.com et al
as 3:2017cv01267
Plaintiff:
Gloria Sun Jung Yun
Defendant:
Gladiacoin.com, Gladiacoin.us, Bitcoinsbrain.com and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Jung v. Bank of America, N.A., ET AL
as 3:2015mc00561
Claimant:
Gloria Sun Jung
Debtor:
Bank of America, N.A., BAC Home Loans Service LP, Phelan Hallinan & Shcmieg, LLP and others
SWEENEY v. PRETTI et al
as 2:2015cv06234
Plaintiff:
JASON SWEENEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH M. PRETTI and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GATTA v. COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv05703
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GATTA
Defendant:
COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS, INC., RONALD PHILLIPS, LINDA PANSULLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MUCCI v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DARBY et al
as 2:2014cv05215
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI MUCCI
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DARBY, MICHAEL TAYLOR, STEPHEN ORSKOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
