Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Benford v. Dowd et al
as 4:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Defendant:
James M. Dowd, Gary M. Gaertner Jr. and Robin Ransom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Estate of Jessie Bean et al
as 4:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Rep Estate of Jessie Bean and Percy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Benford v. Stimson
as 4:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Defendant:
S. Stimson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benford v. Cornejo et al
as 4:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Defendant:
Robert Cornejo, Reid Forrester and Curtis Chick Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benford v. Dowd et al
as 4:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Defendant:
James M. Dowd, Robin Ransom and Gary M. Gaertner Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jessie v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Karen Jessie
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Allen v. Allen et al
as 1:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Keon Allen
Defendant:
Jessie Allen, Austin Ketchum, Lakeisha Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham et al v. Thornhill et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
James Cunningham and Chanda McKee
Defendant:
Judge Matthew Thornhill, Brandon T Pittenger, Pittenger Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
