Cases 11 - 20 of 1,619
Brazell v. Lindsey et al
as 6:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Jason Brazell
Defendant:
Scott Lindsey, Texas County Memorial Hospital, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Courtright v. Epic Games, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04055
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Epic Games, Inc., Roblox Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Carey Courtwright and Carey Courtright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moseley v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant:
Henderson, Watson, Ahka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Mars, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Paul Horton
Defendant:
Mars, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kristine Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Bill Stange, Billy Loflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moran v. John Doe et al
as 4:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Ryan Moran
Defendant:
John Doe and FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. doing business as FedEx Ground
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollenberg v. Menard, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Doreen M. Hollenberg
Defendant:
Menard, Inc., John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
