Cases 11 - 20 of 41
EVANS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv00523
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE MARINES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN DOES 1 TO 10 and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AGNEW v. ALTOONA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHARLES AGNEW
Defendant:
ALTOONA POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD FENNESSEY, BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOUNSHAR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv04168
Plaintiff:
KHALED ABU MOUNSHAR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CABAN and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CRE/ADC VENTURE 2013-1, LLC v. BENNER et al
as 5:2015cv02260
Defendant:
RICHARD J. BENNER, REBECCA S. BENNER and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Plaintiff:
CRE/ADC VENTURE 2013-1, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
RUSH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2015cv01839
Plaintiff:
DAMON SHERON RUSH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE MARINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv07601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
ONLINE STORES, INC. v. UEP, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01340
Plaintiff:
ONLINE STORES, INC.
Defendant:
UEP, INC. and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Brown v. Keen et al
as 1:2013cv00975
Plaintiff:
James Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Keen , Franklin County , Robert L. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
