Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 20
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. LANIGAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv10390
Plaintiff: SHAMSIDDIN ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant: GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN FALVEY, LINDA SANTORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. LANIGAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv04259
Plaintiff: SHAMSIDDIN ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant: GARY M. LANIGAN, STEPHEN D'ILIO, STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv09227
Petitioner: ANTHONY ROSARIO
Respondent: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN FALVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01743
Plaintiff: SHAMSIDDIN A. ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, STEPHEN D'ILIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. FALVEY
as 3:2014cv05753
Plaintiff: RENE D. EDWARDS
Defendant: JOHN FALVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searles v. Relic
as 13-2060
Petitioner: Suzanne M. Searles
Respondent: Peter Relic, Constance Beaudry, Lloyd Clavert and others
Searles v. Relic
as 12-2491
Petitioner: Suzanne M. Searles
Respondent: West Hartford Board of Education, John Falvey, James J. Moore and others
WOMACK v. WARREN et al
as 3:2012cv01232
Plaintiff: DAVID L. WOMACK
Defendant: CHARLES WARREN, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON, T. BEATTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2010mc00086
Petitioner: MATTHEW HESS
Respondent: JOHN FALVEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008mc00006
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?