Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Woodruff v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00481
Plaintiff:
John Paul Woodruff
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv02580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry, Local 52 Employee Pension Plan et al v. M&M Construction Corp., Inc.
as 2:2011cv00077
Plaintiff:
United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry, Local 52 Employee Pension Plan , U.A. Local 52 Health & Welfare Plan , Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union 52 Joint Apprenticeship Trust and others
Defendant:
M&M Construction Corp., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Shafer v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv02009
Plaintiff:
John Paul Shafer
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaviers v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv01889
Petitioner:
John Paul Chaviers
Respondent:
United States of America, Chris Curry, Timothy Laatsch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chaviers v. Curry et al
as 2:2009cv01760
Plaintiff:
John Paul Chaviers
Defendant:
Chris Curry, Anderson, Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw et al v. Nexcheck, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
Irene Bradshaw and John Paul Glass
Defendant:
Nexcheck, LLC and Nexcheck of Alabama, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Davis v. Davis (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv00815
Plaintiff:
John Paul Davis
Defendant:
Lynn Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
